Posts Tagged ‘Bolton’

Fabrice Muamba’s collapse last week has deeply affected me. It’s affected me as a sports fan, me as a journalism major, and me as a person. So naturally, I’m going to do the only thing I really know, and that’s write about it.

Why do we watch sports, anyways? For some of us, they’re a career. There’s athletes, physios, broadcasters, coaches, statisticians, journalists, groundskeepers, agents. You name it, it exists as a sports job. Forget those exist. Why do WE watch sports? It’s an escape of course. It’s a chance for everyone to forget how bad of a day they had at work, forget how their significant other is being completely illogical and can’t see things your way, and most of all, cheer for some idea, some entity we call a team.

I’m not here to talk about all that, except for the last part. The concept of a team is an interesting one. Players, front office staff, owners, medics, all the parts that make up a team come and go with the years, but the unidentifiable entity we call a “team” remains. The thing I find most intriguing about a team is why we all feel so strongly about them.

Take me for example. How the hell did I end up rooting for Fulham? Well, part of the reason is because of a man Clint Dempsey. He’s American. I’m American. Even though he’s across the Atlantic Ocean, is way better shape than me, way more famous than me, and makes gobs more money than I do, for whatever idiotic reason, I think he and I are somehow alike.

That, my friends, is the key concept I’m after here today. Identification is the basis of all sports. Whether you’ve played sports your whole life or you tried soccer once when you were three and kept getting pushed over until you quit, you think you know what it’s like for those players and coaches you would practically give your life for. Why else do we yell obscenities at a television? “Make a substitution you #&$*!!!!” We identify with our team, feel what they’re going through, agree or disagree with key moments in a match or a season.

Anyways, all that blabbering got me to this: When I saw Fabrice Muamba on the pitch, the identification sector of my brain had a field day. First, I saw the other players on the pitch. I’ve never been face to face with someone who’s dying (nor do I hope to in my days), but for whatever reason my mass of nerve endings in my head immediately thought it knew exactly why Rafael van der Vaart was crying, exactly why Owen Coyle ran onto the pitch, exactly why some people were praying. I felt everything. Then, without quite frankly knowing anything about Fabrice Muamba, I identified with his family, I identified with his friends, I identified with him.

After you’re done with the nonsense I’ve put on this blog page, you should read this article on Grantland by Brian Phillips. It’s quite possibly the best article I have ever read, and I’ve read a lot of articles in my days of journalism. He recaps exactly what everyone was feeling during that moment, particularly how, during the moments of news silence we experienced a half hour after he collapsed, we all started to be bombarded with his life story. Frantic journalists with no news on his status told stories of how he came from war-torn Congo, of how he got engaged, of how he has a young kid, of how he genuinely feels adopted by England and plays for the U-21 national team. Phillips says the following:

Muamba was one of those guys — you know, the ones whose teammates like and respect them, whose coaches never have anything but praise for their effort. In the day-to-day clockwork of sports, those guys can drive you crazy; here comes another commentator with another retrograde cliché about character, Vern. But this wasn’t day-to-day clockwork. This was one specific case of a kid maybe dying for no reason, a kid who actually had an admirable character, in a way that just cut straight through all the accumulated cobwebs of irony that protect you from the mediation of sports.

Bingo. We all identified with Muamba because, even though you may not have grown up in war-torn Congo, or heard gunfire at night, or had to pick up and move your family to another country just to survive, or flat out collapsed on a pitch with no one around you and possibly die……..we’ve all faced some form of adversity. And that mass of nerve endings in your head causes you to immediately identify with adversity. It’s the easiest thing to identify with. That bully you had to put up with in 4th grade who took your lunch money every day makes you think you know what he’s going through. And in some weird, twisted sense, you do.

Fabrice Muamba

I mean, how do you NOT identify with that!? Look at that smile!!

And instantly, you start singing Muamba’s name. Or, if you heard the crowd singing his name, you start to feel like you should be singing his name. You pull every inch of moral fiber in your brain to find whatever little bit of karma you may have sitting around in the fuel tank and try to telepathically send it his way. At least, I know I did. It’s natural. You can’t help it.

Well folks, whatever karma we conjured up did the trick. No, nobody here saved Fabrice Muamba’s life. In fact, I don’t even think the doctors did (please don’t get me wrong, those guys are absolute heros for what they did. It’s the kind of job only certain people can do without absolutely breaking down and losing all sense of reality). No, it’s a flat out miracle. The kid was clinically dead for SEVENTY-EIGHT MINUTES. For over an hour, his heart was dead silent, his brain and vital organs weren’t receiving any blood, and doctors did whatever they could to get his gears working again.

And in the end, he lived. He woke up. He can recognize people. He’s talking and joking with doctors. It’s an absolute, 100% miracle. There’s no other way to describe it.

And that, folks, is why this hit me so hard. I’ve identified with just about as many people in this situation as I possibly could. I’m identified-out. But something sticks when you identify with someone. Why do we root so hard for an invisible entity called a team? Why, when you see someone wearing the shirt of your team, a complete stranger, do you get a warm fuzzy feeling inside like you just saw a friend you haven’t seen in 10 years, and for no reason at all you walk up to said complete stranger and pump your fist and say “go [team x]!” Because something sticks. In the case of rooting for a team, it’s a lasting compassion. And I think it’s the same here. Everyone’s rooting for Muamba now. We all identified with him, the entiretly of the sports-loving community.

That’s why this hit me so hard. That’s why I get emotional when I read that article by Brian Phillips. That’s why I love sports. Because it brings people, complete strangers, together in the best, and in the worst of times. Even when there are lives of other complete strangers on the line.

I was looking through transfer rumors before I went to sleep last night, and I found that Bolton striker Johan Elmander was going to most likely be leaving Bolton this summer during the window. He has been linked to both Newcastle and Bundesliga club Hoffenheim, although Bolton manager Owen Coyle has stated he would like Elmander back if he wants (which he doesn’t at this point).

Johan Elmander (courtesy telegraph.co.uk)

But I would like to chat up Mark Hughes and tell him that Fulham should pursue this striker. He has 9 goals in 28 matches this season (10 in 32 if you count the FA cup), and with a transfer market value at the moment of just over £6.5 million according to transfermarkt.co.uk (although I would have to assume that could go up to around £8 million, which is what he signed at Bolton for in 2008), he’s right in the price range for a quality yet cheaper striker.

I feel that the Swedish national, inserted next to Bobby Zamora, would seriously improve this attack. Couple Zamora and Elmander, and add a third up front in Moussa Dembele, who’s pretty much a midfielder/striker hybrid, and you can play a very effective 4-3-3 with Duff, Sidwell, Dempsey, and Murphy battling it out at midfielder and AJ (who I have been impressed by but I still think is playing over his true form) and Gudjohnsen coming off the bench. This would allow for an improved strike force without sacrificing defense.

Bottom line: Hey Hughes, Elmander would look pretty darn good in White.

Mark Hughes Disappointed With Refereeing

Posted: February 25, 2011 by Kyle Bonn in Postgame
Tags: , , ,

(From Feb 20, 2011)

Mark Hughes criticized referee Stuart Atwell’s decision making in the 1-0 loss to Bolton earlier today.

Hughes:

“There were a couple of situations where you think the referee needs to make a positive decision and just waving your arms for an advantage can be a cop-out. In and around the box you don’t particularly want advantage. You want free-kicks and set-plays, which we didn’t seem to get. In the second half, there were a few decisions we found difficult to understand.”

I completely agree with him, although not just with the advantage decisions.  I think the refereeing was very inconsistent the entire match, and that was frustrating.  In soccer, there are often a lot of decisions that could go either way.  And the most important thing in refereeing, to me, is that you not get everything spot on right, especially when it takes multiple replays to confirm something, but that you’re consistent in your calling.  The refereeing was the opposite of that in this match, and that’s what frustrated me the most.

Also, quick side note from an American: I really hate how in American sports, the players and coaches aren’t allowed to criticize refereeing.  Sometimes, it’s very warranted.  And it is frustrating when coaches and players dance questions about the refereeing because they’ll get fined if they speak their mind.  So seeing someone able to say something like this is very refreshing for me.

Any thoughts?

(From Feb 20, 2011)

I feel like I’ve seen it so many times before.  Fulham downed by a lack of finishing ability and one disaster of a clear attempt.  That’s been the story of the season, and it’s been the play that at one point put them into the relegation zone.  They hang and hang and try and try and pound and pound but to no avail.  The tale of the game was the same throughout: Fulham got 4502938 chances at goal and couldn’t finish, and Bolton got about 5 chances and made the most of them.  Let’s break this disappointing one down.

The good:

-Bobby Zamora: If there’s anything to take away from this match, it’s the fact that Bobby Zamora came back about 10 days ahead of schedule, and did exactly what everyone should have expected: be a factor, but ultimately be rusty.  I don’t think anyone can blame him for a few offside calls or the foul or two he had.  It’s excellent to have him back and I’m excited for the future of the season with him.  I think he’s earned his spot on the front line back, and if he hasn’t, he should very soon.  I’m going to be posting in a bit about where to put him, because at the moment it’s going to be tough to figure out who to bench.

-Mark Schwarzer: There was nothing he could do on the lone Bolton goal, as the defense failed him miserably.  Otherwise, he made some pretty impressive saves to keep his side in this.  I think it’s safe to say that Fulham, with Schwarzer in goal and Stockdale on the bench, their goalie depth and ability is first class.

-Chris Baird: I thought he played well.  He was a factor in the back of the attack for much of the game.  He should have been sent off for shoving Petrov to the ground, but the ref missed it, and both players received yellows instead.  The defense was spotty, but I don’t think it was Baird’s doing.

The bad:

-The defense other than Baird: We’ll start with Hangeland’s assist of Bolton’s only goal. 

Yuck to say the least.  Headed it right to Klasnic for the goal.  The defense as a whole was very spotty, and Bolton had a very good chance on almost every attack they had, as few as those were.

-The attack’s finishing: They couldn’t get a good shot in. At all.  But the ones they took were very poor. Dembele and Dempsey each had one good strike but Bogdan saved them both.

-The refereeing: Missed a key tug on Dempsey’s shirt, missed a push that should have sent Baird off, and made a ton of other odd calls/no-calls.  Overall a very bad job.  Hughes was not happy afterwards

MVP: Bolton’s defense.  They kept Fulham from getting anything good whatsoever.  Fulham was on the attack most of the match, but Bolton’s defense kept them from getting closer than just inside the box.  It was an impressive performance by them.

This was a very physical match and Bolton managed it well.  The next match doesn’t get any easier.  Time to travel to Manchester City in a week.

(From Feb 20, 2011)

Then again, we did destroy them (I don’t think I’ll stop bragging about that beatdown for a while.  Sure felt good).  But, time to move on in the tournament.  It’s not getting much easier.

Bolton are one of those clubs that’s flown incredibly under the radar this season.  After beating Tottenham in the last round, I saw the matchup and thought getting one of Wigan or Bolton was a win-win.  Then I realized they are in 8th position in the Premier League table.  Whoops.  This will be no easy task.  Let’s take a look at the hard facts, then we’ll try and predict what’s going to happen.  Because, you know, it’s pretty easy to predict sports.

State of Fulham:

Fulham’s recent FA cup form, as you all know, are most recently coming off a surprising yet incredibly promising 4-0 beatdown of Tottenham.  I still hold that Spurs beat themselves more than Fulham beat them, but it was a great sign nonetheless.  In the Premier League, the Cottagers are coming off that emotional roller coaster with Chelsea that ended 0-0.  The team has really picked up their form in recent weeks.  If you told me in December that I’d be writing a preview where I mentioned a drubbing of Tottehman and a draw with Chelsea we should have won, I would have promptly laughed in your face and bought 4 handles of some very hard alcohol.

The best part of this club so far has been their defense no doubt.  Hangeland and Hughes are absolute studs in the back, and their presence has been a force.  Salcido played relatively well against Chelsea, but I still hold that he should not start, especially with Senderos on his way back (you’ll find out I don’t care for the Mexican very much).

As far as injuries go, the most notable one is Clint Dempsey.  As recent as 2 days ago, Mark Hughes said he fully expected Dempsey to be ready to go despite a sore big toe, but all of a sudden word on the street is he may instead fall victim to the FA Cup and its relative lack of importance to the Premier League, even though the team has made it this far.  If he can’t go, expect Dembele and Johnson to be up front and Gera to start in the middle.  Dempsey’s benching may also result in a lot of time for, and perhaps even a chance at a start for Eduir Gudjohnsen, who recently has said he wants to stay in Fulham (more on that later).  Also, Zamora is only a week or two from being back and Senderos is about 3 weeks away, and while they will be absolutely welcomed back with open arms, the team has been playing well without them as of late.

State of Bolton:

Like I said earlier, they’ve been flying very under the radar.  Their strength is in their spread out, steady attack, with not only Kevin Davies and Johann Elmander up front able to score, but with 3 of their midfielders having already put the ball in the net this season as well.

On the injury front, here’s where the match gets interesting.  Bolton are without two of their starting defenders Zat Knight (former Fulham member) and Sam Ricketts, not just for this match, but for the long term as well.  Knight is out 6 weeks or so with knee damage (side note: who made knees? Talk about a design flaw) and Ricketts will miss the rest of the year with an Achillies tear (a la Senderos).  This will force manager Owen Coyle to have to do some serious mixing and matching.

Fulham will win if:

They take advantage of the aforementioned injuries to the Bolton back line.  They played Chelsea EXTREMELY defensively, often keeping all 11 players on their own half of the pitch.  This match will require just the opposite and will be a good test of the team’s relatively depleted and underwhelming attack.  Not taking anything away from the Bolton attack, which has its moments, but I would venture a guess that 2 goals, possibly even 1, could be enough to win the match for Fulham, due to our back line’s recent form.  The only way they will get those 2 or 1 goals will be if they keep on the pressure all 90+ minutes.  Mark Hughes picked his attacking moments incredibly well against Chelsea I thought, but with our attack, you can’t just pick your spots, you have to keep it on full power all match or that goal never comes.

Prediction:

I’m probably oversimplifying this a lot, and maybe I’m asking too much of the defense, but if we can hold Tottenham and Chelsea to clean sheets, why not Bolton?
Fulham moves on 2-0.

Also, I will be live tweeting during the game as best I can (as long as foxsoccer.tv behaves) so follow me @FulhamsFinest